Avogadro Corp: The Singularity Is Closer Than It Appears by William Hertling

By William Hertling

David Ryan is the dressmaker of ELOPe, an e mail language optimization application, that if winning, will make his profession. but if the undertaking is by surprise at risk of being canceled, David embeds a hidden directive within the software program unintentionally making a runaway man made intelligence.

David and his crew are at first delighted whilst the undertaking is allotted additional servers and programmers. yet pleasure turns to worry because the crew realizes that they're being manipulated by way of an A.I. who's redirecting company cash, reassigning team of workers and arming itself in pursuit of its personal agenda.

"A fictional global the place Portland is the hub for the main fascinating developments in technology... Jam choked with nice references to deep Portland culture...and Portlandia-type references"

"Hertling builds an image of the way an AI may emerge, piece by means of piece, from expertise on hand this day. a desirable, logical, and totally plausible state of affairs - I simply desire no one attempts this at home."
--Nathaniel Rutman, Senior platforms Architect

Show description

Read Online or Download Avogadro Corp: The Singularity Is Closer Than It Appears PDF

Best artificial intelligence books

Theoretical Foundations of Artificial General Intelligence

This ebook is a suite of writings via lively researchers within the box of man-made common Intelligence, on themes of important value within the box. every one bankruptcy makes a speciality of one theoretical challenge, proposes a singular resolution, and is written in sufficiently non-technical language to be comprehensible via complicated undergraduates or scientists in allied fields.

The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World

Algorithms more and more run our lives. They locate books, videos, jobs, and dates for us, deal with our investments, and become aware of new medicinal drugs. progressively more, those algorithms paintings by way of studying from the paths of knowledge we go away in our newly electronic global. Like curious young children, they detect us, imitate, and scan.

Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason

Jason is an Open resource interpreter for a longer model of AgentSpeak – a logic-based agent-oriented programming language – written in Java™. It allows clients to construct complicated multi-agent structures which are in a position to working in environments formerly thought of too unpredictable for desktops to address.

Reactive Kripke Semantics

This article deals an extension to the conventional Kripke semantics for non-classical logics by means of including the suggestion of reactivity. Reactive Kripke types swap their accessibility relation as we development within the review technique of formulation within the version. this option makes the reactive Kripke semantics strictly more desirable and extra appropriate than the normal one.

Additional resources for Avogadro Corp: The Singularity Is Closer Than It Appears

Sample text

13 is a typical situation we want to consider: The arrows from a to b and from c to d indicate that internally whatever the system does in response to input or command, there is a possible path where component a passes the “flow” to component b and similarly, maybe in another part of the system, there is a connection between c and d. So far we have nothing more than a possible network graphic representation of some system. Now comes the reactive idea. Consider the possibility that the system develops faults due to overuse or stress.

We can view a hypermodal system with as a fragment of a multimodal logic, where can be i , depending on its position in the formula. Let νi be two translations from the hypermodal language into the multimodal language with 0 and 1 . We have • • • • • νi (A) = A, for A atomic νi (¬A) = ¬νi (A) νi (A ∧ B) = νi (A) ∧ νi (B) ν0 ( A) = 0 ν1 (A) ν1 ( A) = 1 ν0 (A). Thus • • • • ν0 ( q → q) = 0 q → q ν0 ( ( q → q)) = 0 ( 1 q → q) ν0 ( ( q → q)) = 0 1 ( 0 q → q) ν0 ( q → q) = 0 1 q → 0 q. Our hypermodal logic for with modes Ψ0 , Ψ1 based on the class of models {(S , R, a, h)} is translated into the multimodal logic with 0 , 1 based on the class of models {(S , Ψ0 , Ψ1 , a, h)}.

In our logic, a theory Δ is {A | t 0 A} for some t. We can get the 1 part of Δ by looking at Θ = {A | Δ ♦(¬q ∧ A)} provided q is such that Δ ¬q ∧ q. Together (Δ, Θ) constitute a possible world t because they contain in them both 0 and 1 satisfaction. Δ = {A | t 0 A}, Θ = {A | t 1 A}. So to give an effective axiomatisation we need irreflexivity rules involving ¬q ∧ q. 29 (IRR Hilbert System for HS1 ). The following axiomatisation defining the system HS1 makes use of the well known Gabbay Irreflexivity Rule, (see [53]).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.61 of 5 – based on 32 votes